3.9 - 004_httpd.patch Problems
Chaz Gilbert
chaz_meister_rock at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 3 12:23:35 PDT 2006
wow, i have no idea where i got that src.tar.gz
tarball, but it was not accurate. i just replaced
/usr/src with a fresh copy from my cd and the patch
worked like a charm.
duh. sorry for bugging everyone.
-chaz
> hi dave,
>
> thanks for the quick response. i definitely have
> not aliased the "rm"
> command. your hint about
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/Makefile* was spot on.
>
> 1) i don't even have the file "Makefile".
> 2) the checksums on "Makefile.bsd-wrapper" and
> "Makefile.tmpl" do not
> match your outputs.
>
> hmm... maybe i grabbed the src.tar.gz from an older
> version of openbsd?
> oh well, i'll cvs update the src to "STABLE".
>
> i'll post back with my results.
>
> thanks again,
> chaz
>
>
> Woodchuck wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Chaz Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> greetings all,
> >>
> >> i'm probably doing something stupid, but i can't
> >> figure out why the patch won't work for my 3.9
> system.
> >> any help is greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> -chaz
> >
> > I tried this, successfully (at least so far, I'm
> in the main make),
> > without errors. (3.9 STABLE, cvs'ed to about 4
> July).
> >
> > Differences: I didn't install the patch. I ran
> as root (no sudo).
> >
> > The trouble line in the makefile looks like:
> >
> > .if ${.OBJDIR} == ${.CURDIR}
> > clean: prereq cleanman
> > @cd ${.OBJDIR} && ${MAKE} clean && rm -f
> ${MUNGEDFILES}
> > .else
> > clean: cleanman
> > @cd ${.OBJDIR} && find . \! -type d
> -print0 | xargs -0r rm
> > .endif
> >
> >
> > in my Makefile.bsd-wrapper. Could yours be
> different?
> >
> > It would appear that we are both hitting the first
> line ("MUNGEDFILES").
> > It would further appear that the second line
> ("xargs") lacks a -f
> > on rm, which is a minor error.
> >
> > The MD5 sum of my file:
> >
> > [root at pequod.chuck httpd]# md5 Makefile*
> > MD5 (Makefile) = 0feec83164f335521cdb2f2a389f566b
> > MD5 (Makefile.bsd-wrapper) =
> 7cdc8ac3d511db37730a6f00e658dd9c
> > MD5 (Makefile.tmpl) =
> bd646a05c6ecc45346d6c1825c23f6a6
> >
> > I then got the patch, applied it (just as you did,
> except no sudo --
> > i'm brave, have had root since 1985...), and
> cookie-cuttered
> > the make commands again ... no errors.
> >
> > In your position, I'd do a cvs on your source
> tree, and note anything
> > funky in the httpd tree, or possibly in the
> various make infrastructure
> > files.
> >
> > A longshot: make sure that you haven't aliased
> "rm" to something
> > weird. I notice that the stock /etc/ksh.kshrc
> aliases certain
> > commands to themselves plus flags. (alias du="du
> -k" for one example).
> > This is a bad idea, especially for root. It
> introduces a subtle
> > problem. Perhaps, following a bad example, you
> have been led into
> > this practice for "rm"? This is a long shot, but
> there's something
> > wrong with either the makefile, the name of a file
> in the tree (that
> > shouldn't be there?) or the rm command (or what
> your system has
> > been led to believe is the rm command). Some
> people, longing for
> > other operating systems, redefine "rm" as a shell
> command that makes
> > some sort of weak attempt to "save" files so that
> they can be
> > "undeleted" later. Bad idea. I have seen rm
> commonly aliased to
> > "rm -i", which can cause much grief.
> >
> > Let us know if you find a bug or if it heals
> itself, OK?
> >
> > See also the comment below at the error.
> >
> >>
> >> src$ sudo patch -p0 < ~/004_httpd.patch
> >> Password:
> >> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> >> The text leading up to this was:
> >> --------------------------
> >> |Apply by doing:
> >> | cd /usr/src
> >> | patch -p0 < 004_httpd.patch
> >> |
> >> |And then rebuild and install httpd and its
> modules:
> >> | cd usr.sbin/httpd
> >> | make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
> >> | make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
> >> | make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper depend
> >> | make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
> >> | make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper install
> >> |
> >> |If httpd had been started, you might want to run
> >> | apachectl stop
> >> |before running "make install", and
> >> | apachectl start
> >> |afterwards.
> >> |
> >> |Index:
> >> usr.sbin/httpd/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
> >>
>
|===================================================================
> >> |RCS file:
> >>
>
/cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c,v
> >> |retrieving revision 1.24
> >> |retrieving revision 1.24.6.1
> >> |diff -u -p -r1.24 -r1.24.6.1
> >> |---
> usr.sbin/httpd/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
> >> 9 Feb 2005 12:13:10 -00
> >> |00 1.24
> >> |+++
> usr.sbin/httpd/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
> >> 28 Jul 2006 15:21:30 -0
> >> |000 1.24.6.1
> >> --------------------------
> >> Patching file
> >> usr.sbin/httpd/src/modules/standard/mod_rewrite.c
> >> using Plan A...
> >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 2762.
> >> Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage.
> >> done
> >>
> >> src$ cd usr.sbin/httpd/
> >>
> >> httpd$ sudo make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
> >> /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/obj ->
> /usr/obj/usr.sbin/httpd
> >>
> >> httpd$ sudo make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
> >> rm -f src/support/dbmmanage.cat1
> >> src/support/htdigest.cat1
> src/support/htpasswd.cat1
> >> src/support/apachectl.cat8
> src/support/logresolve.cat8
> >> httpd.cat8 src/support/rotatelogs.cat8
> >> src/support/apxs.cat8 src/support/suexec.cat8
> >> src/support/dbmmanage.ps1
> src/support/htdigest.ps1
> >> src/support/htpasswd.ps1
> src/support/apachectl.ps8
> >> src/support/logresolve.ps8 httpd.ps8
> >> src/support/rotatelogs.ps8 src/support/apxs.ps8
> >> src/support/suexec.ps8
> >> usage: rm [-dfiPRr] file ...
> >> *** Error code 123
> >
> > It would appear that you have neatly formatted
> this output, namely by
> > wrapping the various file names for the rm. In
> future, don't. Leave
> > it raw. I'm wondering at this point if the
> definition of "MUNGEDFILES"
> > has been corrupted in your makefile(s) somehow.
> >
> > My output looks like this:
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Openbsd-newbies
mailing list