From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Thu Sep 11 17:49:49 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:49:49 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
Message-ID: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>

I try to make sendmail on a 4.3 installation work with SMTP-AUTH, and after
some searching in the archives, came across that link:

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-10/1145.html

apparently the above should be followed?

Well, first of all I did install the cyrus-sasl package but don't have
/etc/mk.conf in my system? Also 're-compile sendmail' translates to what?


Thanks for your help
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080911/1e187c9f/attachment.html 

From marmot at pennswoods.net  Thu Sep 11 17:56:00 2008
From: marmot at pennswoods.net (Woodchuck)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:

> Well, first of all I did install the cyrus-sasl package but don't have
> /etc/mk.conf in my system? Also 're-compile sendmail' translates to what?

Create /etc/mk.conf by hand.  (644 root/wheel seems to work).

Add contents as required.

Mine just has

PIPE=-pipe

(Due to some historical reason, i.e. I forget why I put that in there.)

Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
	# cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
	# make clean
	# make obj
	# make
	# make install

Whether the plain make will catch the presence of sasl and grok
all your desires I don't know.  One would *think so*, but...

Disclaimer: I've not built sendmail with sasl, my comments are
all 'off the cuff'.

Dave
-- 
        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes

From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Thu Sep 11 20:03:24 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:03:24 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
Message-ID: <3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> > Well, first of all I did install the cyrus-sasl package but don't have
> > /etc/mk.conf in my system? Also 're-compile sendmail' translates to what?
>
> Create /etc/mk.conf by hand.  (644 root/wheel seems to work).
>
> Add contents as required.
>
> Mine just has
>
> PIPE=-pipe
>
> (Due to some historical reason, i.e. I forget why I put that in there.)
>
> Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
>        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>        # make clean
>        # make obj
>        # make
>        # make install
>
> Whether the plain make will catch the presence of sasl and grok
> all your desires I don't know.  One would *think so*, but...
>
> Disclaimer: I've not built sendmail with sasl, my comments are
> all 'off the cuff'.
>
> Dave
> --
>        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
>        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
> _______________________________________________
> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>


I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:

/usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
or
/usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail
or
/usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail

The first is the correct one?

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080911/f1ab71e1/attachment.html 

From marmot at pennswoods.net  Thu Sep 11 20:20:33 2008
From: marmot at pennswoods.net (Woodchuck)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:20:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com> 
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:

> > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
> >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
> >        # make clean
> >        # make obj
> >        # make
> >        # make install
> >
> 
> I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
> 
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail

Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.

As I suggested :-)

> or
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail

No

> or
> /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail

No.

> The first is the correct one?

Yes.

Dave
-- 
        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes

From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Fri Sep 12 15:56:27 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:56:27 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
Message-ID: <3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> > > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
> > >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
> > >        # make clean
> > >        # make obj
> > >        # make
> > >        # make install
> > >
> >
> > I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
> >
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>
> Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.
>
> As I suggested :-)
>
> > or
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail
>
> No
>
> > or
> > /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail
>
> No.
>
> > The first is the correct one?
>
> Yes.
>
> Dave
> --
>        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
>        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
> _______________________________________________
> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>

up to now everything worked fine. I did recompile and no errors showed up!

Now, how do I verify that SMTP-AUTH capability is included? Any conf file I
should look into?

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080912/f342aa8b/attachment.html 

From ciurdar at hotmail.com  Fri Sep 12 16:36:11 2008
From: ciurdar at hotmail.com (Szilveszter Ciurdar)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:36:11 -0400
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
Message-ID: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Greetings,

What is the difference between these two packages for 4.3? I'm using the
i386 architecture.

redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz
fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz

Can't wait for the 4.4 release!

From jus at krytosvirus.com  Fri Sep 12 17:02:46 2008
From: jus at krytosvirus.com (Justin Krejci)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:02:46 -0500
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com><Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck><3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com><Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0fc201c914e8$9e11baa0$a000010a@usicorp.usinternet.com>

I am not a sendmail admin and generally try to avoid it where possible so I
am not sure about the configuration file needs but you should be able to
connect to the mail server and issue the ehlo command to see if it is active
in your current running binary. After re-compiling and installing you will
of course have to restart sendmail so it loads the newly made binary
executable.

 

To check using telnet

 

telnet IPADDRESS 25

220 your.hostname.here ESMTP Sendmail

ehlo f

 

Once you issue the "ehlo" command it should give you the output similar to
this

 

250-your.mailserver.name Hello youraddress, pleased to meet you

250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES

250-PIPELINING

250-8BITMIME

250-SIZE

250-DSN

250-ETRN

250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN

250-DELIVERBY

250 HELP

 

There may be more or less stuff than this but the key you are looking for is
the AUTH LOGIN PLAIN. It may show up with other things like CRAM-MD5 on the
same line.

 

  _____  

From: openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org
[mailto:openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Berth
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:56 AM
To: Woodchuck
Cc: openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
Subject: Re: sendmail SMTP-AUTH

 

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:

> > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
> >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
> >        # make clean
> >        # make obj
> >        # make
> >        # make install
> >
>

> I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
>
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail

Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.

As I suggested :-)


> or
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail

No


> or
> /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail

No.


> The first is the correct one?

Yes.


Dave
--
       Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
       creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
_______________________________________________
Openbsd-newbies mailing list
Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies


up to now everything worked fine. I did recompile and no errors showed up!

Now, how do I verify that SMTP-AUTH capability is included? Any conf file I
should look into?

Thanks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080912/82e057bc/attachment-0001.html 

From jjhartley at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 20:54:06 2008
From: jjhartley at gmail.com (James Hartley)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:54:06 -0700
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
In-Reply-To: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <e81c31b60809121154t1a732900mb98e0252c23c4aa5@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Szilveszter Ciurdar
<ciurdar at hotmail.com> wrote:
> What is the difference between these two packages for 4.3? I'm using the
> i386 architecture.
>
> redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz
> fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz

See the following:

http://www.openbsd.org/4.3_packages/i386/redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz-long.html
http://www.openbsd.org/4.3_packages/i386/fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz-long.html

fedora_base is newer, but some some applications may be more
compatible with redhat_base.  Most important, you should study Section
9.4 of the FAQ:

http://openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact

...along with the compat_linux(8) manpage.

At the mirrors, I only find the following:

-r--r--r--    1 20001    0        30439431 Mar 14  2008 redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz
-r--r--r--    1 20001    0         2049399 Mar 14  2008 redhat_libc5-6.2p1.tgz
-r--r--r--    1 20001    0         1027677 Mar 14  2008
redhat_motif-2.1.30p3.tgz

From jjhartley at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 20:58:13 2008
From: jjhartley at gmail.com (James Hartley)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:58:13 -0700
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
In-Reply-To: <e81c31b60809121154t1a732900mb98e0252c23c4aa5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<e81c31b60809121154t1a732900mb98e0252c23c4aa5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e81c31b60809121158q3a559371o41894d9d177d8108@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:54 AM, James Hartley <jjhartley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Szilveszter Ciurdar
> <ciurdar at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> What is the difference between these two packages for 4.3? I'm using the
>> i386 architecture.
>>
>> redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz
>> fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz
>
> See the following:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/4.3_packages/i386/redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz-long.html
> http://www.openbsd.org/4.3_packages/i386/fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz-long.html
>
> fedora_base is newer, but some some applications may be more
> compatible with redhat_base.  Most important, you should study Section
> 9.4 of the FAQ:
>
> http://openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact
>
> ...along with the compat_linux(8) manpage.

Please ignore the directory listing posted at the bottom of my
previous response.  I inadvertently hit "send" without removing it.
Fedora packages are available at the mirrors:

-r--r--r--    1 20001    0        36759163 Mar 14  2008 fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz
-r--r--r--    1 20001    0          998600 Mar 14  2008
fedora_motif-2.1.30p0.tgz

My bad.

From badut at mail.dk  Fri Sep 12 22:38:43 2008
From: badut at mail.dk (badut at mail.dk)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:38:43 +0200
Subject: ACPI /smp problems on HP Laptop
Message-ID: <20080912203843.JURN15675.fep51.mail.dk@post.tele.dk>

Hello,

If I don?t disable acpi, my HP nc6400 Laptop (Centrino Duo, no apm) freezes  when loading bsd.mp and reboots when loading bsd.mp. (i386 4.3 Release)

And I suppose I need a working acpi to enable smp.

Is it possible to do something in UKC to get acpi to function

Thanks in advance

Jesper




OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
    deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.83 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
real mem  = 2138468352 (2039MB)
avail mem = 2059755520 (1964MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 09/05/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0000, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf398f (23 entries)
bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version "68YCU Ver. F.0B" date 09/05/2007
bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq nc6400 (RM100ET#ABY)
acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf0000/0x2000
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf07c0/192 (10 entries)
pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xff880/192 (10 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 ("Intel 82801FBM LPC" rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #32 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc0000/0x10000!
cpu0 at mainbus0
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06130b2506000b25
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1833 MHz (1292 mV): speeds: 1833, 1000 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Host" rev 0x03
agp0 at pchb0: aperture at 0xe0000000, size 0x10000000
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
"Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: irq 10
azalia0: codec[s]: Analog Devices/0x1981, AT&T/Lucent/0x3026, using Analog Devices/0x1981
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
pci1 at ppb0 bus 8
bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5753M" rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1 (0x4201): irq 10, address 00:16:d4:f2:9b:0d
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
pci2 at ppb1 bus 16
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: irq 10, MoW2, address 00:1b:77:31:8d:bb
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 5
pci3 at ppb2 bus 32
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 5
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xe1
pci4 at ppb3 bus 2
cbb0 at pci4 dev 6 function 0 "TI PCIXX12 CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 11
"TI PCIXX12 Multimedia Card Reader" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 2 not configured
sdhc0 at pci4 dev 6 function 3 "TI PCIXX12 Secure Data" rev 0x00: irq 11
sdmmc0 at sdhc0
"TI PCIXX12 Smart Card" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 4 not configured
cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
pcmcia0 at cardslot0
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GBM LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <MATSHITA, UJDA775 DVD/CDRW, 1.00> SCSI0 5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GBM AHCI" rev 0x01: irq 10, AHCI 1.1
scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: <ATA, ST980811AS, 3.BH> SCSI3 0/direct fixed
sd0: 76319MB, 9729 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 156301488 sec total
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker>
spkr0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom2: irq 5 already in use
biomask ef7d netmask ef7d ttymask ffff
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
ugen0 at uhub2 port 1 "AuthenTec Fingerprint Sensor" rev 1.10/6.23 addr 2
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
ugen1 at uhub1 port 1 "Broadcom Corp HP Integrated Module" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
syncing disks... done
rebooting...
OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
    deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.83 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
real mem  = 2138468352 (2039MB)
avail mem = 2059755520 (1964MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 09/05/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0000, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf398f (23 entries)
bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version "68YCU Ver. F.0B" date 09/05/2007
bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq nc6400 (RM100ET#ABY)
acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf0000/0x2000
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf07c0/192 (10 entries)
pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xff880/192 (10 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 ("Intel 82801FBM LPC" rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #32 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc0000/0x10000!
cpu0 at mainbus0
cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06130b2506000b25
cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1833 MHz (1292 mV): speeds: 1833, 1000 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Host" rev 0x03
agp0 at pchb0: aperture at 0xe0000000, size 0x10000000
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
"Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: irq 10
azalia0: codec[s]: Analog Devices/0x1981, AT&T/Lucent/0x3026, using Analog Devices/0x1981
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
pci1 at ppb0 bus 8
bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5753M" rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1 (0x4201): irq 10, address 00:16:d4:f2:9b:0d
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
pci2 at ppb1 bus 16
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: irq 10, MoW2, address 00:1b:77:31:8d:bb
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 5
pci3 at ppb2 bus 32
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 5
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xe1
pci4 at ppb3 bus 2
cbb0 at pci4 dev 6 function 0 "TI PCIXX12 CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 11
"TI PCIXX12 Multimedia Card Reader" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 2 not configured
sdhc0 at pci4 dev 6 function 3 "TI PCIXX12 Secure Data" rev 0x00: irq 11
sdmmc0 at sdhc0
"TI PCIXX12 Smart Card" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 4 not configured
cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
pcmcia0 at cardslot0
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GBM LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <MATSHITA, UJDA775 DVD/CDRW, 1.00> SCSI0 5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GBM AHCI" rev 0x01: irq 10, AHCI 1.1
scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: <ATA, ST980811AS, 3.BH> SCSI3 0/direct fixed
sd0: 76319MB, 9729 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 156301488 sec total
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker>
spkr0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom2: irq 5 already in use
biomask ef7d netmask ef7d ttymask ffff
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
ugen0 at uhub2 port 1 "AuthenTec Fingerprint Sensor" rev 1.10/6.23 addr 2
ugen1 at uhub1 port 1 "Broadcom Corp HP Integrated Module" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
softraid0 at root
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b

From phessler at theapt.org  Sat Sep 13 09:39:04 2008
From: phessler at theapt.org (Peter Hessler)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:39:04 +0200
Subject: ACPI /smp problems on HP Laptop
In-Reply-To: <20080912203843.JURN15675.fep51.mail.dk@post.tele.dk>
References: <20080912203843.JURN15675.fep51.mail.dk@post.tele.dk>
Message-ID: <20080913073904.GG17460@gir.theapt.org>

You should try out a recent snapshot (or 4.4 when it is released).  There 
have been many changes to ACPI support during that time, which helped out 
my HP laptop (nx6125) immensly.



On 2008 Sep 12 (Fri) at 22:38:43 +0200 (+0200), badut at mail.dk wrote:
:Hello,
:
:If I don?t disable acpi, my HP nc6400 Laptop (Centrino Duo, no apm) freezes  when loading bsd.mp and reboots when loading bsd.mp. (i386 4.3 Release)
:
:And I suppose I need a working acpi to enable smp.
:
:Is it possible to do something in UKC to get acpi to function
:
:Thanks in advance
:
:Jesper
:
:
:
:
:OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
:    deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
:cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.83 GHz
:cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
:real mem  = 2138468352 (2039MB)
:avail mem = 2059755520 (1964MB)
:mainbus0 at root
:bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 09/05/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0000, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf398f (23 entries)
:bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version "68YCU Ver. F.0B" date 09/05/2007
:bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq nc6400 (RM100ET#ABY)
:acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
:pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf0000/0x2000
:pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf07c0/192 (10 entries)
:pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum
:pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xff880/192 (10 entries)
:pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11
:pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 ("Intel 82801FBM LPC" rev 0x00)
:pcibios0: PCI bus #32 is the last bus
:bios0: ROM list: 0xc0000/0x10000!
:cpu0 at mainbus0
:cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06130b2506000b25
:cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
:cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1833 MHz (1292 mV): speeds: 1833, 1000 MHz
:pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
:pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Host" rev 0x03
:agp0 at pchb0: aperture at 0xe0000000, size 0x10000000
:vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03
:wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
:wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
:"Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
:azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: irq 10
:azalia0: codec[s]: Analog Devices/0x1981, AT&T/Lucent/0x3026, using Analog Devices/0x1981
:audio0 at azalia0
:ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
:pci1 at ppb0 bus 8
:bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5753M" rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1 (0x4201): irq 10, address 00:16:d4:f2:9b:0d
:brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
:ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
:pci2 at ppb1 bus 16
:wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: irq 10, MoW2, address 00:1b:77:31:8d:bb
:ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 5
:pci3 at ppb2 bus 32
:uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
:uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
:uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
:uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 5
:ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
:usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
:uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
:ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xe1
:pci4 at ppb3 bus 2
:cbb0 at pci4 dev 6 function 0 "TI PCIXX12 CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 11
:"TI PCIXX12 Multimedia Card Reader" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 2 not configured
:sdhc0 at pci4 dev 6 function 3 "TI PCIXX12 Secure Data" rev 0x00: irq 11
:sdmmc0 at sdhc0
:"TI PCIXX12 Smart Card" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 4 not configured
:cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
:cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
:pcmcia0 at cardslot0
:ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GBM LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
:pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
:atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
:scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
:cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <MATSHITA, UJDA775 DVD/CDRW, 1.00> SCSI0 5/cdrom removable
:cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
:pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
:ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GBM AHCI" rev 0x01: irq 10, AHCI 1.1
:scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
:sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: <ATA, ST980811AS, 3.BH> SCSI3 0/direct fixed
:sd0: 76319MB, 9729 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 156301488 sec total
:usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
:uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
:uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
:uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
:uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:isa0 at ichpcib0
:isadma0 at isa0
:pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
:pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
:pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
:wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
:pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
:pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
:wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
:pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
:midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker>
:spkr0 at pcppi0
:lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
:npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
:pccom2: irq 5 already in use
:biomask ef7d netmask ef7d ttymask ffff
:mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
:ugen0 at uhub2 port 1 "AuthenTec Fingerprint Sensor" rev 1.10/6.23 addr 2
:softraid0 at root
:root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
:ugen1 at uhub1 port 1 "Broadcom Corp HP Integrated Module" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
:syncing disks... done
:rebooting...
:OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
:    deraadt at i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
:cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.83 GHz
:cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
:real mem  = 2138468352 (2039MB)
:avail mem = 2059755520 (1964MB)
:mainbus0 at root
:bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 09/05/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0000, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf398f (23 entries)
:bios0: vendor Hewlett-Packard version "68YCU Ver. F.0B" date 09/05/2007
:bios0: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq nc6400 (RM100ET#ABY)
:acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
:pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf0000/0x2000
:pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf07c0/192 (10 entries)
:pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum
:pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xff880/192 (10 entries)
:pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11
:pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 ("Intel 82801FBM LPC" rev 0x00)
:pcibios0: PCI bus #32 is the last bus
:bios0: ROM list: 0xc0000/0x10000!
:cpu0 at mainbus0
:cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x06130b2506000b25
:cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
:cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1833 MHz (1292 mV): speeds: 1833, 1000 MHz
:pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
:pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Host" rev 0x03
:agp0 at pchb0: aperture at 0xe0000000, size 0x10000000
:vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03
:wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
:wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
:"Intel 82945GM Video" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
:azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801GB HD Audio" rev 0x01: irq 10
:azalia0: codec[s]: Analog Devices/0x1981, AT&T/Lucent/0x3026, using Analog Devices/0x1981
:audio0 at azalia0
:ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
:pci1 at ppb0 bus 8
:bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5753M" rev 0x21, BCM5750 C1 (0x4201): irq 10, address 00:16:d4:f2:9b:0d
:brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
:ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 10
:pci2 at ppb1 bus 16
:wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: irq 10, MoW2, address 00:1b:77:31:8d:bb
:ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: irq 5
:pci3 at ppb2 bus 32
:uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
:uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
:uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 11
:uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 5
:ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: irq 10
:usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
:uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
:ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xe1
:pci4 at ppb3 bus 2
:cbb0 at pci4 dev 6 function 0 "TI PCIXX12 CardBus" rev 0x00: irq 11
:"TI PCIXX12 Multimedia Card Reader" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 2 not configured
:sdhc0 at pci4 dev 6 function 3 "TI PCIXX12 Secure Data" rev 0x00: irq 11
:sdmmc0 at sdhc0
:"TI PCIXX12 Smart Card" rev 0x00 at pci4 dev 6 function 4 not configured
:cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
:cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 3 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
:pcmcia0 at cardslot0
:ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GBM LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
:pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
:atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
:scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
:cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <MATSHITA, UJDA775 DVD/CDRW, 1.00> SCSI0 5/cdrom removable
:cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
:pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
:ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GBM AHCI" rev 0x01: irq 10, AHCI 1.1
:scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
:sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: <ATA, ST980811AS, 3.BH> SCSI3 0/direct fixed
:sd0: 76319MB, 9729 cyl, 255 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 156301488 sec total
:usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
:uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
:uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
:uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
:uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
:isa0 at ichpcib0
:isadma0 at isa0
:pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
:pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
:pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
:wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
:pmsi0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
:pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot
:wsmouse0 at pmsi0 mux 0
:pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
:midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker>
:spkr0 at pcppi0
:lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
:npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
:pccom2: irq 5 already in use
:biomask ef7d netmask ef7d ttymask ffff
:mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
:ugen0 at uhub2 port 1 "AuthenTec Fingerprint Sensor" rev 1.10/6.23 addr 2
:ugen1 at uhub1 port 1 "Broadcom Corp HP Integrated Module" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
:softraid0 at root
:root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
:_______________________________________________
:Openbsd-newbies mailing list
:Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
:http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
:

-- 
Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.

From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Mon Sep 15 11:48:31 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:48:31 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <0fc201c914e8$9e11baa0$a000010a@usicorp.usinternet.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>
	<0fc201c914e8$9e11baa0$a000010a@usicorp.usinternet.com>
Message-ID: <3494db260809150248l68d4148cl87b5de9a91874e62@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Justin Krejci <jus at krytosvirus.com> wrote:

>  I am not a sendmail admin and generally try to avoid it where possible so
> I am not sure about the configuration file needs but you should be able to
> connect to the mail server and issue the ehlo command to see if it is active
> in your current running binary. After re-compiling and installing you will
> of course have to restart sendmail so it loads the newly made binary
> executable.
>
>
>
> To check using telnet
>
>
>
> *telnet IPADDRESS 25*
>
> 220 your.hostname.here ESMTP Sendmail
>
> *ehlo f*
>
>
>
> Once you issue the "ehlo" command it should give you the output similar to
> this
>
>
>
> 250-your.mailserver.name Hello youraddress, pleased to meet you
>
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>
> 250-PIPELINING
>
> 250-8BITMIME
>
> 250-SIZE
>
> 250-DSN
>
> 250-ETRN
>
> 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>
> 250-DELIVERBY
>
> 250 HELP
>
>
>
> There may be more or less stuff than this but the key you are looking for
> is the *AUTH LOGIN PLAIN*. It may show up with other things like CRAM-MD5
> on the same line.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org [mailto:
> openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Berth
> *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2008 8:56 AM
> *To:* Woodchuck
> *Cc:* openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> *Subject:* Re: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net> wrote:
>
>  On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:
>
> > > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
> > >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
> > >        # make clean
> > >        # make obj
> > >        # make
> > >        # make install
> > >
> >
>
> > I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
> >
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>
> Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.
>
> As I suggested :-)
>
>
> > or
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail
>
> No
>
>
> > or
> > /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail
>
> No.
>
>
> > The first is the correct one?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> Dave
> --
>        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
>        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
> _______________________________________________
> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>
>
> up to now everything worked fine. I did recompile and no errors showed up!
>
> Now, how do I verify that SMTP-AUTH capability is included? Any conf file I
> should look into?
>
> Thanks
>


After applying the suggested steps, copying over my modified cf file (as it
was with some customizations before recompiling sendmail!) and re-starting
sendmail, my my telnet output displays:

250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE
250-DSN
250-ETRN
250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
250-STARTTLS
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP

I think the above shows that I'm on track?

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080915/1e4a2365/attachment.html 

From ludl1 at hotmail.com  Mon Sep 15 20:23:40 2008
From: ludl1 at hotmail.com (Fredrik Ludl)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:23:40 +0200
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
In-Reply-To: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <BAY124-DAV82AA83528D8A6C70D8398EF520@phx.gbl>

The first package ensures Red Hat compability.
The other package ensures fedora compability.
I have never tried Linux seriously, but as far as I know, each distribution
will have different layout of catalog structure, and so on.
The only thing Linux systems have in common is the kernel, which might be
the same.
(What a mess) 

-----Original Message-----
From: openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org
[mailto:openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] On Behalf Of Szilveszter Ciurdar
Sent: den 12 september 2008 16:36
To: openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability

Greetings,

What is the difference between these two packages for 4.3? I'm using the
i386 architecture.

redhat_base-8.0p9.tgz
fedora_base-4.0p3.tgz

Can't wait for the 4.4 release!
_______________________________________________
Openbsd-newbies mailing list
Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies


From DStaal at usa.net  Tue Sep 16 02:37:38 2008
From: DStaal at usa.net (Daniel Staal)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:37:38 -0400
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
In-Reply-To: <BAY124-DAV82AA83528D8A6C70D8398EF520@phx.gbl>,
	<C3E55811012B44BB8EF72EF8188CCEB4@LUDL.local>
References: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<BAY124-DAV82AA83528D8A6C70D8398EF520@phx.gbl>,
	<C3E55811012B44BB8EF72EF8188CCEB4@LUDL.local>
Message-ID: <3EAA5A6D37F4545261DBAB5E@Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com>

--As of September 15, 2008 8:23:40 PM +0200, Fredrik Ludl is alleged to 
have said:

> The first package ensures Red Hat compability.
> The other package ensures fedora compability.
> I have never tried Linux seriously, but as far as I know, each
> distribution will have different layout of catalog structure, and so on.
> The only thing Linux systems have in common is the kernel, which might be
> the same.
> (What a mess)

--As for the rest, it is mine.

In this case at least the question it justified: 'fedora' is RedHat's 
non-commercial release, so they /should/ be roughly similar.  (As the only 
thing that's really supposed to be different between those two distros is 
what happens if you pick up the phone and call RedHat, and how much you've 
paid.)

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------

From ludl1 at hotmail.com  Tue Sep 16 08:13:59 2008
From: ludl1 at hotmail.com (Fredrik Ludl)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:13:59 +0200
Subject: OpenBSD Linux Compatability
In-Reply-To: <3EAA5A6D37F4545261DBAB5E@Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com>
References: <1221230171.3262.1273634723@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<BAY124-DAV82AA83528D8A6C70D8398EF520@phx.gbl>,
	<C3E55811012B44BB8EF72EF8188CCEB4@LUDL.local>
	<3EAA5A6D37F4545261DBAB5E@Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com>
Message-ID: <BAY124-DAV1FC3F11F0DEB670FCEAA3EF4D0@phx.gbl>

Well, I can make my statement even clearer.
Both packages have something to do with Linux on OpenBSD
Linux is a jungle of different distributions with different specialties.
Some of them are commercial some are free.
In any kind, my best advise is to see what you want to do, and look in the
ports tree for the program, and not try Linux packages on your system.
Fredrik Ludl

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Staal [mailto:DStaal at usa.net] 
Sent: den 16 september 2008 02:38
To: Fredrik Ludl; openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
Subject: RE: OpenBSD Linux Compatability

--As of September 15, 2008 8:23:40 PM +0200, Fredrik Ludl is alleged to 
have said:

> The first package ensures Red Hat compability.
> The other package ensures fedora compability.
> I have never tried Linux seriously, but as far as I know, each
> distribution will have different layout of catalog structure, and so on.
> The only thing Linux systems have in common is the kernel, which might be
> the same.
> (What a mess)

--As for the rest, it is mine.

In this case at least the question it justified: 'fedora' is RedHat's 
non-commercial release, so they /should/ be roughly similar.  (As the only 
thing that's really supposed to be different between those two distros is 
what happens if you pick up the phone and call RedHat, and how much you've 
paid.)

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------


From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Wed Sep 17 11:09:43 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:09:43 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <3494db260809150248l68d4148cl87b5de9a91874e62@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>
	<0fc201c914e8$9e11baa0$a000010a@usicorp.usinternet.com>
	<3494db260809150248l68d4148cl87b5de9a91874e62@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3494db260809170209s2243df28g2581819b5a1c997b@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tony Berth <tonyberth at googlemail.com>wrote:

>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Justin Krejci <jus at krytosvirus.com>wrote:
>
>>  I am not a sendmail admin and generally try to avoid it where possible
>> so I am not sure about the configuration file needs but you should be able
>> to connect to the mail server and issue the ehlo command to see if it is
>> active in your current running binary. After re-compiling and installing you
>> will of course have to restart sendmail so it loads the newly made binary
>> executable.
>>
>>
>>
>> To check using telnet
>>
>>
>>
>> *telnet IPADDRESS 25*
>>
>> 220 your.hostname.here ESMTP Sendmail
>>
>> *ehlo f*
>>
>>
>>
>> Once you issue the "ehlo" command it should give you the output similar to
>> this
>>
>>
>>
>> 250-your.mailserver.name Hello youraddress, pleased to meet you
>>
>> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>>
>> 250-PIPELINING
>>
>> 250-8BITMIME
>>
>> 250-SIZE
>>
>> 250-DSN
>>
>> 250-ETRN
>>
>> 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>
>> 250-DELIVERBY
>>
>> 250 HELP
>>
>>
>>
>> There may be more or less stuff than this but the key you are looking for
>> is the *AUTH LOGIN PLAIN*. It may show up with other things like CRAM-MD5
>> on the same line.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org [mailto:
>> openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Berth
>> *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2008 8:56 AM
>> *To:* Woodchuck
>> *Cc:* openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
>> *Subject:* Re: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net> wrote:
>>
>>  On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:
>>
>> > > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
>> > >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>> > >        # make clean
>> > >        # make obj
>> > >        # make
>> > >        # make install
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> > I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
>> >
>> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>>
>> Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.
>>
>> As I suggested :-)
>>
>>
>> > or
>> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail
>>
>> No
>>
>>
>> > or
>> > /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail
>>
>> No.
>>
>>
>> > The first is the correct one?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> Dave
>> --
>>        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
>>        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
>> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
>> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>>
>>
>> up to now everything worked fine. I did recompile and no errors showed up!
>>
>> Now, how do I verify that SMTP-AUTH capability is included? Any conf file
>> I should look into?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
> After applying the suggested steps, copying over my modified cf file (as it
> was with some customizations before recompiling sendmail!) and re-starting
> sendmail, my my telnet output displays:
>
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250-SIZE
> 250-DSN
> 250-ETRN
> 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
> 250-STARTTLS
> 250-DELIVERBY
> 250 HELP
>
> I think the above shows that I'm on track?
>
> Thanks
>
>
some more questions now regarding how SMTP-AUTH works!

Currently I have dovecot as IMAP server installed and when retrieving
e-mails from KMail everything works just fine. Now, after recompiling
sendmail with SMTP-AUTH I did search for kind of a tutorial to make all that
work with a MUA - in my case KMail but didn't find any!

When I did a test from KMail to check what auth options do I have from my
server regarding SMTP, I got TLS and GSSAPI, DIGEST-MD5 and CRAM-MD5. So
this part was OK. Now when entering the UNIX credentials of that user, I got
in maillog:

-----------------------
Sep 17 00:12:30 <server> sm-mta[12694]: STARTTLS=server, relaay=<IP
Address>, version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=NO, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA,
bits=256/256
Sep 17 00:12:30 <server> sm-mta[12694]: m8GMCTlh012694: <IP Address> did not
issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA
-------------------------

Following the man pages, tried the following:

sasldblistusers2 produced: listusers failed
applied saslpasswd2 and entered an account but this didn't show up in
sasldblistusers2 neither KMail was able to auth!
realised that sasl2 demon was not running after installing the package! So I
did start that as root manualy ( saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost) but this
didn't help either! I still get the same error in maillog!

Thanks for your help

Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080917/0de3bd82/attachment-0001.html 

From tonyberth at googlemail.com  Thu Sep 18 11:00:57 2008
From: tonyberth at googlemail.com (Tony Berth)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:00:57 +0200
Subject: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
In-Reply-To: <3494db260809170209s2243df28g2581819b5a1c997b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3494db260809110849r4bc055f4xca09999da6f56180@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111151430.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809111103y2c25720dn7f46e94d853045f5@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0809111418130.14428@rachel.chuck>
	<3494db260809120656y2f556d72wdc088fcd87c9a73c@mail.gmail.com>
	<0fc201c914e8$9e11baa0$a000010a@usicorp.usinternet.com>
	<3494db260809150248l68d4148cl87b5de9a91874e62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3494db260809170209s2243df28g2581819b5a1c997b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3494db260809180200x61b05a55o9ac09cdf2fce6bc0@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Tony Berth <tonyberth at googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tony Berth <tonyberth at googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Justin Krejci <jus at krytosvirus.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  I am not a sendmail admin and generally try to avoid it where possible
>>> so I am not sure about the configuration file needs but you should be able
>>> to connect to the mail server and issue the ehlo command to see if it is
>>> active in your current running binary. After re-compiling and installing you
>>> will of course have to restart sendmail so it loads the newly made binary
>>> executable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To check using telnet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *telnet IPADDRESS 25*
>>>
>>> 220 your.hostname.here ESMTP Sendmail
>>>
>>> *ehlo f*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Once you issue the "ehlo" command it should give you the output similar
>>> to this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 250-your.mailserver.name Hello youraddress, pleased to meet you
>>>
>>> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>>>
>>> 250-PIPELINING
>>>
>>> 250-8BITMIME
>>>
>>> 250-SIZE
>>>
>>> 250-DSN
>>>
>>> 250-ETRN
>>>
>>> 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
>>>
>>> 250-DELIVERBY
>>>
>>> 250 HELP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There may be more or less stuff than this but the key you are looking for
>>> is the *AUTH LOGIN PLAIN*. It may show up with other things like
>>> CRAM-MD5 on the same line.
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org [mailto:
>>> openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Berth
>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2008 8:56 AM
>>> *To:* Woodchuck
>>> *Cc:* openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: sendmail SMTP-AUTH
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Woodchuck <marmot at pennswoods.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Tony Berth wrote:
>>>
>>> > > Re-compiling sendmail probably translates to
>>> > >        # cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>>> > >        # make clean
>>> > >        # make obj
>>> > >        # make
>>> > >        # make install
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I did create mk.conf but sendmail is located in:
>>> >
>>> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail
>>>
>>> Yes.  This is for the whole sendmail suite of pgms.
>>>
>>> As I suggested :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> > or
>>> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail
>>>
>>> No
>>>
>>>
>>> > or
>>> > /usr/src/usr.bin/file/magdir/sendmail
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>
>>> > The first is the correct one?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave
>>> --
>>>        Are there no natural enemies to limit the increase of these
>>>        creatures?              -- Sherlock Holmes
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
>>> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
>>> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>>>
>>>
>>> up to now everything worked fine. I did recompile and no errors showed
>>> up!
>>>
>>> Now, how do I verify that SMTP-AUTH capability is included? Any conf file
>>> I should look into?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>> After applying the suggested steps, copying over my modified cf file (as
>> it was with some customizations before recompiling sendmail!) and
>> re-starting sendmail, my my telnet output displays:
>>
>> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>> 250-PIPELINING
>> 250-8BITMIME
>> 250-SIZE
>> 250-DSN
>> 250-ETRN
>> 250-AUTH GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
>> 250-STARTTLS
>> 250-DELIVERBY
>> 250 HELP
>>
>> I think the above shows that I'm on track?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
> some more questions now regarding how SMTP-AUTH works!
>
> Currently I have dovecot as IMAP server installed and when retrieving
> e-mails from KMail everything works just fine. Now, after recompiling
> sendmail with SMTP-AUTH I did search for kind of a tutorial to make all that
> work with a MUA - in my case KMail but didn't find any!
>
> When I did a test from KMail to check what auth options do I have from my
> server regarding SMTP, I got TLS and GSSAPI, DIGEST-MD5 and CRAM-MD5. So
> this part was OK. Now when entering the UNIX credentials of that user, I got
> in maillog:
>
> -----------------------
> Sep 17 00:12:30 <server> sm-mta[12694]: STARTTLS=server, relaay=<IP
> Address>, version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=NO, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA,
> bits=256/256
> Sep 17 00:12:30 <server> sm-mta[12694]: m8GMCTlh012694: <IP Address> did
> not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA
> -------------------------
>
> Following the man pages, tried the following:
>
> sasldblistusers2 produced: listusers failed
> applied saslpasswd2 and entered an account but this didn't show up in
> sasldblistusers2 neither KMail was able to auth!
> realised that sasl2 demon was not running after installing the package! So
> I did start that as root manualy ( saslauthd -a rimap -O localhost) but this
> didn't help either! I still get the same error in maillog!
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Tony
>
>
>
Any chance to to have some help on this?

Thanks for your support

Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-newbies/attachments/20080918/302ee401/attachment.html 

From vim.unix at googlemail.com  Fri Sep 19 10:10:48 2008
From: vim.unix at googlemail.com (Pau)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:10:48 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
Message-ID: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I'm sorry to have to ask these quesitons, but this is a bit of a pain.

I have installed obsd 4.3 on a laptop for my wife. Everything fine. Easy.

Now, she doesn't want to learn the basics of fvwm or another
light-weight wm. She started in a w$ world, and later from a
linux-kde-gnome world.

Ok, I decided to install the monster. I tried gnome. I installed gdm,
everything fine... BUT, when she logs in, the wm is screwed up.
There's only a terminal on a blue (haha) background without even
window decoration. Alt + mouse does not drag the window. There's
nothing. No gnome. No fancy menus, no nothing. Just a terminal.

When she logs in choosing "fail safe gnome session" (or similar) from
gdm, gnome protests "some scripts will not work blabla", but gnome is
there (some icons are screwed up but it works)

I found this irritating. I decided to give kde a try.

Result? Exactly the same, different background color (I think).

The problem seems to be unrelated to kde/gnome...

I have installed every package, this is not a missing library or
programme, applet, application, thingamabob.

I followed

www.openbsdsupport.org/gnome-GDM.html

and

www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html

Any idea?

Thanks

From vim.unix at googlemail.com  Fri Sep 19 10:33:00 2008
From: vim.unix at googlemail.com (Pau)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:33:00 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
In-Reply-To: <BAY124-DAV87E479150D3A9CA82442CEF4E0@phx.gbl>
References: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY124-DAV87E479150D3A9CA82442CEF4E0@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <30c383e70809190133i7c927beex8187a5a9b764ab7f@mail.gmail.com>

But X is working

I'm not saying I don't believe you, I just would like to understand the reason



2008/9/19 Fredrik Ludl <ludl1 at hotmail.com>:
> I was in the same mess, and the first problem was configure X right.
> Start there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org
> [mailto:openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] On Behalf Of Pau
> Sent: den 19 september 2008 10:11
> To: OpenBSD-Newbie
> Subject: kde / gnome... boring
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry to have to ask these quesitons, but this is a bit of a pain.
>
> I have installed obsd 4.3 on a laptop for my wife. Everything fine. Easy.
>
> Now, she doesn't want to learn the basics of fvwm or another
> light-weight wm. She started in a w$ world, and later from a
> linux-kde-gnome world.
>
> Ok, I decided to install the monster. I tried gnome. I installed gdm,
> everything fine... BUT, when she logs in, the wm is screwed up.
> There's only a terminal on a blue (haha) background without even
> window decoration. Alt + mouse does not drag the window. There's
> nothing. No gnome. No fancy menus, no nothing. Just a terminal.
>
> When she logs in choosing "fail safe gnome session" (or similar) from
> gdm, gnome protests "some scripts will not work blabla", but gnome is
> there (some icons are screwed up but it works)
>
> I found this irritating. I decided to give kde a try.
>
> Result? Exactly the same, different background color (I think).
>
> The problem seems to be unrelated to kde/gnome...
>
> I have installed every package, this is not a missing library or
> programme, applet, application, thingamabob.
>
> I followed
>
> www.openbsdsupport.org/gnome-GDM.html
>
> and
>
> www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>
>

From ludl1 at hotmail.com  Fri Sep 19 10:40:06 2008
From: ludl1 at hotmail.com (Fredrik Ludl)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:40:06 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
In-Reply-To: <30c383e70809190133i7c927beex8187a5a9b764ab7f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY124-DAV87E479150D3A9CA82442CEF4E0@phx.gbl>
	<30c383e70809190133i7c927beex8187a5a9b764ab7f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BAY124-DAV190AFA0C456C3CDB09B2AEF4E0@phx.gbl>

OK, I se tonight at my desktop box what I did.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pau [mailto:vim.unix at googlemail.com] 
Sent: den 19 september 2008 10:33
To: Fredrik Ludl
Cc: OpenBSD-Newbie
Subject: Re: kde / gnome... boring

But X is working

I'm not saying I don't believe you, I just would like to understand the
reason



2008/9/19 Fredrik Ludl <ludl1 at hotmail.com>:
> I was in the same mess, and the first problem was configure X right.
> Start there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org
> [mailto:openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] On Behalf Of Pau
> Sent: den 19 september 2008 10:11
> To: OpenBSD-Newbie
> Subject: kde / gnome... boring
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry to have to ask these quesitons, but this is a bit of a pain.
>
> I have installed obsd 4.3 on a laptop for my wife. Everything fine. Easy.
>
> Now, she doesn't want to learn the basics of fvwm or another
> light-weight wm. She started in a w$ world, and later from a
> linux-kde-gnome world.
>
> Ok, I decided to install the monster. I tried gnome. I installed gdm,
> everything fine... BUT, when she logs in, the wm is screwed up.
> There's only a terminal on a blue (haha) background without even
> window decoration. Alt + mouse does not drag the window. There's
> nothing. No gnome. No fancy menus, no nothing. Just a terminal.
>
> When she logs in choosing "fail safe gnome session" (or similar) from
> gdm, gnome protests "some scripts will not work blabla", but gnome is
> there (some icons are screwed up but it works)
>
> I found this irritating. I decided to give kde a try.
>
> Result? Exactly the same, different background color (I think).
>
> The problem seems to be unrelated to kde/gnome...
>
> I have installed every package, this is not a missing library or
> programme, applet, application, thingamabob.
>
> I followed
>
> www.openbsdsupport.org/gnome-GDM.html
>
> and
>
> www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Openbsd-newbies mailing list
> Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
> http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
>
>


From ludl1 at hotmail.com  Fri Sep 19 10:17:50 2008
From: ludl1 at hotmail.com (Fredrik Ludl)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:17:50 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
In-Reply-To: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BAY124-DAV87E479150D3A9CA82442CEF4E0@phx.gbl>

I was in the same mess, and the first problem was configure X right.
Start there.

-----Original Message-----
From: openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org
[mailto:openbsd-newbies-bounces at sfobug.org] On Behalf Of Pau
Sent: den 19 september 2008 10:11
To: OpenBSD-Newbie
Subject: kde / gnome... boring

Hi,

I'm sorry to have to ask these quesitons, but this is a bit of a pain.

I have installed obsd 4.3 on a laptop for my wife. Everything fine. Easy.

Now, she doesn't want to learn the basics of fvwm or another
light-weight wm. She started in a w$ world, and later from a
linux-kde-gnome world.

Ok, I decided to install the monster. I tried gnome. I installed gdm,
everything fine... BUT, when she logs in, the wm is screwed up.
There's only a terminal on a blue (haha) background without even
window decoration. Alt + mouse does not drag the window. There's
nothing. No gnome. No fancy menus, no nothing. Just a terminal.

When she logs in choosing "fail safe gnome session" (or similar) from
gdm, gnome protests "some scripts will not work blabla", but gnome is
there (some icons are screwed up but it works)

I found this irritating. I decided to give kde a try.

Result? Exactly the same, different background color (I think).

The problem seems to be unrelated to kde/gnome...

I have installed every package, this is not a missing library or
programme, applet, application, thingamabob.

I followed

www.openbsdsupport.org/gnome-GDM.html

and

www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html

Any idea?

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Openbsd-newbies mailing list
Openbsd-newbies at sfobug.org
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies


From vim.unix at googlemail.com  Fri Sep 19 19:36:03 2008
From: vim.unix at googlemail.com (Pau)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:36:03 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
In-Reply-To: <20080919151232.GA21316@jggimi.homeip.net>
References: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080919151232.GA21316@jggimi.homeip.net>
Message-ID: <30c383e70809191036n3ad8bf34x3d8fb8f46fba8256@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, Josh...

thanks a lot for your answer... I actually fixed the problem but did
not understand the why of the fix. Fredrik was right. The damned gnome
thing expects an xorg.file placed in /usr/X11

Why? No idea... But gnome is happy now

Is this a bug?

Pau

2008/9/19, Josh Grosse <josh at jggimi.homeip.net>:
> I cannot tell, from what you've posted, what your problem might be.  If you
>  have a broadband connection and a DVD burner, you might try downloading
>  either my kde or gnome LiveDVD images of OpenBSD 4.3-release, and seeing if
>  you have the same symptoms, and comparing configurations.
>
>  Note:  In these versions of the LiveCDs/LiveDVDs, the /etc/rc.local script uses
>  X -configure and the resulting xorg.conf file -- you may find deleting the
>  xorg.conf file the best way to use X.  For 4.4-release, which I will make
>  public in November, my startup script lets you choose between three xorg.conf
>  options: none, VESA, or X -configure.
>
>  The download links, FAQ, etc., can be found at www.jggimi.homeip.net if
>  you're interested.
>

From vim.unix at googlemail.com  Fri Sep 19 21:37:40 2008
From: vim.unix at googlemail.com (Pau)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:37:40 +0200
Subject: kde / gnome... boring
In-Reply-To: <20080919175654.GA30537@jggimi.homeip.net>
References: <30c383e70809190110v31fe93c8gd76f858b85743cb1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080919151232.GA21316@jggimi.homeip.net>
	<30c383e70809191036n3ad8bf34x3d8fb8f46fba8256@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080919175654.GA30537@jggimi.homeip.net>
Message-ID: <30c383e70809191237n477dab54o6ac535b0026cc6ae@mail.gmail.com>

but Josh... my laptop works perfectly fine with fvwm+openbsd and
worked perfectly with obsd4.2+kde (though I think I had an xorg that
time) or under linux+gnome... this is not a hw limitation, this is
something specific to obsd 43 and gnome+kde

I am sending this to -newbies because I think it can be interesting
not only to me but to a number of people

2008/9/19, Josh Grosse <josh at jggimi.homeip.net>:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:36:03PM +0200, Pau wrote:
>  > Hi, Josh...
>  >
>  > thanks a lot for your answer... I actually fixed the problem but did
>  > not understand the why of the fix. Fredrik was right. The damned gnome
>  > thing expects an xorg.file placed in /usr/X11
>  >
>  > Why? No idea... But gnome is happy now
>  >
>  > Is this a bug?
>
>
> No, it's a hardware design limitation.  :)
>
>  As you know, Intel-based workstations/PCs are the world's most popular.
>  There are many different video card implementations, and many vendors who
>  produce products that,  while they do not follow standards exactly, work
>  with Microsoft Windows, which is all they care about.  So, even though they
>  are *supposed* to work generically, they may not.
>
>  The X.Org version of X11, that we use for our X Window System, may or may
>  not work with a default configuration, due to the many slight variations
>  from video standards that we see with i386 (and with amd64, which has the
>  same hardware interfaces for video).  We also see a vast number of monitors,
>  each with different physical characteristics that must be manually configured
>  sometimes, too.
>
>  Because of these many variations of video card and video monitor -- xometimes
>  X.Org's X windows system works without any xorg.conf file.  Sometimes, it
>  does not.  Sometimes it requires manual effort on the user's part
>  to modify the config, too.  FAQ 11 is all about X11 configuration, and the
>  large section of FAQ 11.3 is just for i386 and amd64 setup.
>
>  My LiveCDs all have an xorg.conf file in them, which is set to use 1024x768
>  resolution and 24-bit color.  However, in order for that to work, the video
>  card must be VESA compatible, and the monitor must be capable of 31.5-48.5
>  KHz horizontal sync, vertical sync of 50-70Hz, and a refresh rate of 60Hz.
>  And this is just a fallback configuration in case automatic configuration
>  fails. :)
>
>
>
>    -Josh-
>

From soko.tica at gmail.com  Tue Sep 23 22:53:48 2008
From: soko.tica at gmail.com (soko.tica)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:53:48 +0200
Subject: system snapshot software recommendation (chkrootkit?) asked
Message-ID: <93456eb20809231353n75291e3dye6bf7a740e3bcf5a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I would like to make system snapshot on a fresh install of OpenBSD4.3.
I couldn't have located chkrootkit neither in packages nor in ports.
Is there any software included in OpenBSD recommended for that, or
I'll just have to download sources and compile?

Thanks in advance for any suggestion.